Comment Section Scavenger Hunt

The Internet is an amazing tool. It has single-handedly changed the way we interact with the world and jump started a second Industrial Revolution. It connects communities, streamlines commerce, and helps to save countless lives every day. It is more prolific than planes, trains, and automobiles, and it’s only 25 years old.

An anonymous, unregulated internet is the greatest social experiment of our time (of all time?), and the ways in which we use it are a reflection of our real beliefs and values. Some people exemplify our collective capacity for Good, while others are probably evil. Most people simply articulate the absurdity of our current approach to work or play jokes on people who are just trying to do their best.

That that internet is a quirky, creative, amazing place is probably best summed up by the fact that when you Google “picture of the internet” you get various iterations of this more or less helpful and well-intentioned diagram:

internet

And this not-at-all helpful but certainly amusing picture of, well, I’m not really sure what I’m looking at:

theotherinternet

We all use the web, and we all use it for slightly different things. It has changed the way we do pretty much everything we do, not the least of which is get our news.

The twice daily newspaper gave way to the daily, and for years weekly news magazines offered a distillation of what was going on in the world. The weekly magazine was, without knowing it, foreshadowing its own demise by providing what the people really wanted: a curated meta-analysis of current events.

But the world was made smaller by the internet. The news cycle shrank from a week to the more or less continuous barrage of Breaking Headlines and Not-Quite-Journalism that we have today, and consumers needed a more effective way to make sense of it all. On the one hand, we have Buzzfeed. On the other, we have the comments section.

These pithy tetes-a-tete offer glimpses at Our Collective Id as denizens of the internet lurk behind their keyboards and spew whatever detritus that comes to mind as the gospel truth. The comments section on news stories is essentially the Cliff’s Notes to the internet. It’s a symphony of ideological clashes, xenophobic rage, and honest misinformation, seasoned with a handful of trolls just trying to get your goat.

It’s a beautiful thing, the comments section, and I frequently skip the story all together just to see what We The People think about it. I encourage you to give it a look, if you haven’t before. But because it can be a bit overwhelming, I’d like to guide your efforts with a brief scavenger hunt. If you can find a news story with a comments section that contains everything here, please share it!

Online Comment Section Scavenger Hunt

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail


 

The Animals

From my vantage point of twenty feet off the ground, it was clear that the animals had gained a strategic advantage.

In my left hand I gripped the frame of a cheap fiberglass ladder. In the other I clutched an orbital sander, and my feet were placed carefully so that they would optimize my balance and obscure the words “Not a Step” that were cast into the highest aluminum rung. I was trying very hard to remain composed as a dozen wasps crawled from behind the rotted fascia board and hovered around my head.

This dance with the insects was only the most recent skirmish in an effort to reclaim our home from the resident wildlife.

See, I’m one of those few Millennials to whom home ownership seemed like a good idea. Before I’d spent much time on the market, though, it became clear that houses within my means tended not to be houses at all. Most of the addresses in my price range were either decrepit trailers or condos that felt more like the dorms than a home. The occasional meth den made the list, and eventually fine print like “some smoke damage from grease fire” and “structurally questionable” stopped making our blood pressure rise.

Then we found a gem. It’s a little bungalow in an up-and-coming neighborhood, with a pleasant wooden facade and a yard for the dogs. “It has good bones,” my agent assured me, and collectively we chose to see the rotted soffets, unlivable decor, and eyewatering odor of cat urine that greeted us at the door as low hanging fruit to build sweat equity. The price was right and I pulled the trigger.

I’m not particularly gifted with my hands, but came into the project convinced that with confidence and enough YouTube videos, anything is possible. We built a fence. We tore out the carpet and refinished the floors and stripped the floral wallpaper that reminded me somehow of Nurse Ratched and Mr. Rogers at the same time. After a month of work the house was livable, and only once we started sleeping there did we realize that the place was overrun by animals.

A few days before prepping the gables for painting I engaged in close quarters combat with a family of squirrels who’d made themselves quite at home. It was sunny out, and warm, and I ran a garden hose into their den while I had my coffee. I was delighted to see them run across the fence to seek refuge in the neighbor’s peeling fascia.

DarbySleep-1
Nominally domesticated.

The squirrels seemed to have maintained a tenuous peace with the nominally domesticated but actually feral cats that take their station beneath our parked cars as the sun sets and the shadows grow long. These feline bandits don’t seem to have desires beyond raiding our trash, and we’ve outsourced their harrying to the nominally domesticated but actually feral dog that sleeps on the couch while we’re at work.

Another sect of stinging (biting?) insects erected the flag of their people amid the old paint cans and used motor oil in the shed, and we made quick work of them with $40 worth of Raid. I trust that my descendants will sing songs of our heroics – we charged into the frey brandishing a can of aerosolized poison in each hand and with only a paper mask to keep ourselves safe.

Our home grown war against the wildlife was moving along well. We had technological superiority and advanced brains. Tool Using Man outflanked the insects and rodents at every step.

But then the momentum shifted. It came time to paint the upper reaches of the house, and from the top of the rickety ladder I feared this bestial insurgency was making up ground.

The sight of a man atop an extension ladder is banal. Tradesmen and window washers and homeowners use these crude tools every day. What’s less clear to a passerby is that the asphalt in our alley is uneven; the ladder was leveled with bits of scrap wood and tiles. It was extended to its longest span and I was standing on its top step, going to great lengths not to touch the large diameter power lines that entered the house. Hanging from my belt was an orbital sander, a hammer, a caulk gun, and my trusty can of Raid. The view from there felt much more precarious.

The sander shook these insects loose from their hive, and the Raid was quickly empty. It became clear that we humans could not enforce a no fly zone. Political influence over upper reaches of the house are much more capricious than down low. The chimney is in need of repair soon and the shingles need a cleaning. The gutters either leak or don’t exist, and the future of this conflict will take us off the ground.

The days are growing longer now. Warm weather and the smell of grilling meat herald the dawn of home improvement season. Winter gave a brief reprieve from combat, like Christmas on the western front, but soon we’ll take up arms again.

Switcheroo Guest Post: Passion and Human Factor with David Steele

Good morning, gentlewomen and gentlemen. Yes, it’s Tuesday. Yes: this is a new post. Yes, your browser is not lying: this is still The Gentleman At Large. But unfortunately, your regularly scheduled blogging programming has been hijacked in a backcountry blogging switcharoo: you can find what Ben would have normally posted here over at skinningwithbearspray.com once he gets it to me.

And as the other part of that hijacking, and your gentlemanly eye on the forest keeper for the week, allow me to introduce myself. My name is David Steele. I hail from Kalispell, and often purpose my poetry degree towards writing about backcountry skiing and alpine capers in the mountains around northwest Montana. Check out the link above to see Ben’s post on my home e-turf.

We cooked up this switcharoo idea a while back, and like many of our good ideas, it didn’t come to fruition. I then committed and the backed out on his hut trip at Downing Mountain Lodge. And maybe another trip he proposed up in the Great White North. Then, through the intervention of fate and the vast social whirlpool that is Missoula, we ended up on a four day trip together into the Pioneer Hut outside of Ketchum two weeks ago. Friends have equated spending a day in the mountains as the equivalent of a few months of casual acquaintance: at such a pace our yurt experience felt like a year of good times and close proximity. My apologies for the underwear that I accidentally bombed on the bunk below, Courtney. Skin track conversations lead to me remembering the blog trade thing I said I’d like to do, and here it is. I don’t actually know if Horan has one for me as of this writing, which is both hilarious and totally acceptable.

http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t219/bentsteele/IMG_7470_zpskr1x9u9d.jpg
Horan documenting in his natural habitat.

Human factor issues have received a lot of press and attention in backcountry travel circles the past few years. I’ve found them particularly fascinating and essential to my own decision making  while trying to ski cool things with various groups—heading in for a few days in a foreign snowpack with mostly new people proved a good opportunity to study how human factors in that setting could play out for me.

http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t219/bentsteele/IMG_7529_zpsrop2wihd.jpg

Yeah. The answer came on Day 1, and it was not good. As a group, we had traveled the six miles in, and hauled our gear to the yurt in the morning. The storm from the day previous brought significant new accumulations that had not yet been attacked the ferocious winds common to the area. We headed out for an afternoon of turns that saw us skiing the new snow on a SW aspect that, days prior, had been a bare slope of grass. Most of the group then switched to a N aspect on the opposite side of the canyon (shown in the photo above), an area called the Peanut Gallery.

Above the open area you can see in the photo, we saw, felt and heard multiple large collapses in the snow while skinning to the ridgetop. Our pit revealed a preserved layer of surface hoar nearly a meter down, which accounted for the activity we’d seen on similar aspects on the way in. It failed with energy in the twenties on our ECT. The seven of us decided to ski the lower angle aspects skiers right; once out of the trees, it was glorious. Three of the group split off to head back to the yurt, while Michael, Mike, Ben, and I headed back up for another lap.

I’d eyed up the natural takeoff in the center of the field from the get-go. It seemed perfect for a big air. We dug again before the four of us ascended, and found more problems in the lower pack: the buried surface hoar hadn’t been cooked, wind-killed, or magic’d away. Yet the light was gorgeous as the sun slid toward the horizon. Michael had his camera and wanted to shoot it. As I ripped my skins, I unconsciously switched from all the red flags we’d seen, all the reasons to be cautious, all the info that blatantly told a clear message to back down. I was thinking about the mechanics of how I might hit the roller, how fast I could go, whether there was enough speed to properly flip it into the perfect, classic, convex roll start zone of the landing.

Thus did I drop in and send. If you look at the photo, you can see my landing on the upper looker’s left of the crown. I remember coming around on my backflip, spotting the landing, the impact, and seeing the slab break below and off to my right. Instinct immediately veered me right and I skied off the slab as it started to break up. I traversed into the lower angle terrain and then into the trees. It broke several feet deep, propagated fairly wide, and remote triggered another larger slab on steeper terrain out of frame to the right of the above photo.

None of the rest of the four of us were involved, swept, or injured, and they came down shortly after to look at the wildness I’d just unleashed. The group that had headed back to the yurt watched from the other side of the valley in horror, and eventually saw us head down.

Careful observers will have already noted the many failures we had: a large group of people who didn’t know each other super well, a touchy snowpack that we confirmed (twice) to be reactive, and a commitment/acceptance issue in my decision making about whether and what to hit with the camera rolling. I completely ignored the caution that should be obvious in each of those areas, and endangered myself and my group in the process. I let them down. All of those are actions I desperately wish I could take back. It’s a very lucky thing that it came out as benign as it did.
Traveling in avalanche terrain offers heaping helpings of positive, incorrect feedback. We manage to get away with quite a bit, and sometimes push the envelope having no idea how close we might have been to disaster. Having now stepped over that line in dramatic yet non-catastrophic fashion, I can’t emphasize enough that we have a responsibility to properly treat with the passions and joy that cause us to go and play in avalanche terrain.

It’s easy to work through human factor problems with logic. Yet the heat of the moment and the draw of what we love to do is precisely the danger. Passion was the missing ingredient in all my analyses of how human factors might be affecting me. The work is cut out for me: those moments of excitement and joy need to be well insulated from the parts of me steering the decision ship. There’s nothing abstract about how our loves blind us to the facts of situations, yet that battle is precisely the one we need to think and to fight while making decisions in the mountains.

So count this as yet another testament to the examined life in avalanche terrain. I want to learn more, think more, back down more, and through all that, ski a whole hell of a lot more.

Thanks to all the Squirrel Baits, Snow Scooters, and Blowholes for a great trip. Thanks especially to Ben for lending me his ranting space. You can check out more of my work at skinningwithbearspray.com or follow along on Instagram.

Your Worst Friend

It’s Tuesday. Your alarm goes off at 6:32 and you hit snooze three times. You get out of bed, start the coffee, and let the dog out. Your feet are cold on the kitchen floor.

Between the time the dog comes back in and the coffee is ready, you pull your phone from the charger and scroll through your routine: weather, avy report, Instagram, Facebook, email, in that order.

High of 51, 30% chance of rain. Snowline is 6,500 feet, looks like more of the same all week. Considerable danger, heavy new snow and wind on last week’s melt crust; looks like it needs some time. Next advisory on Thursday. Like a few photos. Leave an emoji comment.

You click the blue square and regret it immediately. You knew you would but you clicked it anyway. Wedding photo, engagement photo, album of baby photos, primary commentary. Scalia is trending. You get past the hot topics to the updates relegated below the fold, the detritus that for some reason you keep coming back to read.

DSC01395

Isn’t this why Twitter is dying? That people have figured out that they have better things to do than scroll through the streams of consciousness of idiots they’ve never met?

The coffee is ready. You pour a cup.

You flick through your newsfeed with your thumb, skimming the profile pictures and a few words at a time for something that might be interesting. It’s more of a tic now than anything, but one genre of post stands out.

“Help me raise awareness of Lou Gehrig’s disease by funding my half Ironman!”

Your blood boils. At least, if you’re anything like me, it makes your skin crawl.

The issue, of course, has nothing to do with fundraising for ALS research, in exactly the same way that your college roommate’s ex-girlfriend’s half Ironman has nothing to do with ALS. Fundraising for disease research is certainly a noble cause, apologizing for liking to be outside is not.

There’s a trend in sports and adventure to partner with philanthropic causes that doesn’t quite sit right with me. It’s as though we feel guilty for spending time doing something that we enjoy or vying for self improvement, and that dedicating our efforts to a charitable cause somehow veils the selfishness that comes with skiing across Antarctica, or pioneering new routes on Baffin Island, or finishing a first half marathon.

To me, partnering with a charity to justify or fund raise for what looks a lot like vacation is, at best, morally opaque, and at worst fraud.

TornakHutTrip-9

Inherent in the trend of Racing for Charity, or Climbing for a Cure, is the implication that racing or climbing is not a worthwhile way to spend our time. A new ice route in Glacier Park or first descent in Chamonix calls for every ounce of passion and toil as a Grammy winning single. An expedition ski tour is as much an expression of creativity as a book of poems.

The implication is that adventure is somehow an idle pursuit, only as valuable as the attention that it brings to some more noble cause. But travel inspires. Each film, or trip report, or story over beers has the ability to light a spark in someone else and to get them to interact with the world in a new way.

Raising money for cancer research is a great thing to do. Here’s a link for a good place to do it. Events that exist primarily as fundraisers, like RATPOD, do a tremendous service as well. But let’s move away from the idea that we need to apologize for our passion with vapid associations with ineffective charities. The journey should be enough.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail


 

 

Recycling is the Worst

Ah, the dinner party.

It’s that staple of human culture whose roots go back to the Holocene. With the discovery of fire came community, and at the dawn of humanity neaderthals crouched in circles to cook the meat of some kind of ungulate and tear its meat from the bone with their teeth. Grunts of approval echoed off of painted cave walls and above the crackle of Prometheus’s greatest gift.

Fast forward 10,000 years and not much has changed. Every once in a while we pay tribute to this prehistoric ceremony and invite friends and family to dinner. We share in the fermented juice of fruits and grains, sear meat and simmer the roots of plants. We carry on the oral history of our tribes, telling and retelling the same stories and jokes, until they take on a life of their own and the feats of our youth are truly Herculean.

cave-painting-936619_1280
That looks like a good party.

The night is grand. The dinner party is a great success. The evening wanes and friends move gaily toward the kitchen, rosy cheeked and high in spirits, to help ferry the dishes to the sink where they can be put off until tomorrow. Inevitably they ask where to leave the empty beer bottles, and inevitably are appalled when I answer.

“You can just throw those in the trash.”

OH! What indigation ensues. “You can recycle those at Hippy WalMart,” they insist (Missoula has no infrastructure to recycle glass, but the denizens at Hippy WalMart advertise that they will ship our glass in empty trucks to Spokane, where it can be ground to rubble before being discarded). And then the evening can’t help but to close on an awkward note after I insist that recycling is bullshit.

There are a few reasons that recycling is a scam. For starters, the vast majority of those so-called recyclable goods that you painstakingly sort, or buy those blue bags for, wind up in the landfill. Plastic that can be recycled at all can usually only be re-purposed once, glass just goes straight to the landfill, and even minor grease spots on a newspaper render the whole bundle to trash.

can-696583_1280

The only really effective recycling infrastructure is, not surprisingly, the one with an economic incentive to the consumer; aluminum can be reused ad infinitum with significant cost and energy savings over producing the raw material.

But the biggest issue with recycling is one that it shares with the Toyota Prius and other well meaning improvements to our global impact: it completely misses the point. It’s easy for me to go about my happy liberal life without changing my behavior, and carrying the warm, smug, glow of knowing that I’m saving the world because I threw my 12 oz. Dasani bottle into the blue trash can instead of the black one with all the bees around it. With this warm fuzzy feeling it’s easy to forget that recycling should be the last resort, and that in order to make any kind of meaningful change we really just need to consume much, much less.

Recycling is an emotional palliative to otherwise well meaning people, and it keeps them from accepting responsibility or effecting actual change. Driving your Prius a mile to work on a nice day is still driving a mile to work on a nice day. Don’t like that your town doesn’t recycle glass? Fill a growler, instead. And rather than furtively making plastic bottles disappear from the public eye one tidy blue bag at a time, I encourage you to throw them on the ground. Litter them with every chance you get, until they’re so ugly, and so pervasive that there’s a pelican or a squirrel or something choking on every street corner in America.

Maybe then people will stop buying plastic bottles of water in the first place.

coffee-987119_1920
Damnit, Liza.