The noble Pigasus, in her natural environs. |
P.S.I saw this sign in Oakland. |
The noble Pigasus, in her natural environs. |
P.S.I saw this sign in Oakland. |
“Man, you really need to get out of there,” my friend Shaun reiterated after several years of giving the same advice. “I know, I know,” I dutifully replied as always, “but it’s just so flexible.” And then the excuses kept flowing. “He can’t help it . . . it’s really not so bad . . . I have easy hours and make okay money and can get all the time off to go play that I need.” As I was unenthusiastically cycling through my routine of defenses of the job that I know I shouldn’t still have, I had a revelation: I had Stockholm Syndrome.
To compare myself to a hostage who eventually begins to sympathize with his captor is perhaps a little bit melodramatic. But considering the downturned economy, the current post-college job placement rate for Millenials, and the brutal competition for professional jobs in this recreational wonderland called Missoula, Montana, it really isn’t that far fetched to see that employers can get away with paying low wages and acting like children and still have a constant stream of overqualified resumes coming through the front door. It’s a buyer’s market, and after three years I continued to justify and forgive unacceptable behavior by my employer.
And so I took a leap. I quit. I quit, to the chagrin of my parents, without a long term plan for how I’ll keep myself alive and not move back in with them. “It’s easier to get a job when you have a job,” they’ve assured me time and time again. But there’s a certain complacency that comes with job security; the fact that the checks keep coming I believe curtails creativity and industry. Colin Wilson called it (and went on to document it thoroughly) the St. Neot Margin. His conclusion was that complacency and the lack of stress leads to a sort of creative equilibrium that precludes growth.
Not long ago I complained to my uncle that I was “trying to quit my job.” He replied, somewhat aghast, “What do you mean trying to quit? It takes like 8 seconds. It’s like firing somebody.” I replied that I liked to eat, and that as much as I love my parents I have no interest in moving back in with them. “Yeah,” he said, “you’d be surprised at how scrappy you get when it’s the end of the month and rent is due.” In a way I think this is a pure example of Wilson’s Margin, and had to take my parental advice with a last grain of salt. A year ago I was at a gin-soaked fundraiser, talking myself out of quitting (I’d been considering quitting this job since the first few months I had it) with another guest who was a decade or so my senior. I explained my parents’ position and before I could finish this conversationalist replied, “Your parents’ job is to look out for you. To give you the safe advice. You just have to consider whether the safe advice is the good advice.”
The extensive use of banned substances in the MLB and NFL over the last several decades is well documented. Even the NBA, from its ivory tower of lucrative and performance driven popularity was forced recently to confront the issue when Orlando’s Hedo Turkoglu tested positive for steroids. At least in policy, these professional organizations acknowledge that performance enhancing drug use is something that should be stigmatized. While no sport in the US punishes the use of banned substances with the same draconian fervor of elite cycling, each governing body as a system in place for imposing sanctions on players.
Athletes may face fines and suspensions of varying severity, and records set with illegal assistance can be stricken or bear an asterisk to note in perpetuity that they were garnered by dishonest means. But despite the (sometimes vapid) strides that professional athletics have taken to disincentivize drug use, the practice continues. And what’s more, banned substance use is not confined to the highest level of sport. Doping bans, while uncommon, are not absent from the ranks of the NCAA and a recent study showed that of the 1500 high school football players who were interviewed, 6% admitted to using some kind of performance enhancing drug. Clearly the very real benefits to performance still outweigh the just as real detriments for some athletes. The fact that doping is persistent in sports leagues that are associated with academic institutions should not be surprising, as doping in schools has been experiencing a crescendo for years.
The first (and only) time that I used a performance enhancing drug it was not to increase my speed on the bike. It was not to jump higher, or run faster, or pick up heavy stuff better (you can confirm all of this anecdotally by asking me to do any of those things and watching). I joined, by some estimates, 25% of today’s university students when I took a couple of Adderall and sat down to finish an otherwise insurmountable quantity of work (40-50 Ben-Hours) in a day. It was incredible. For 8 hours, I didn’t eat. I didn’t drink water, or go to the bathroom. I didn’t check my email or Facebook once. I didn’t even stand up. I worked in a manic fervor for 8 straight hours and finished the last obstacle between me and a Bachelor’s degree with literally minutes to spare.
While using performance enhancing drugs to get a B.S. in Geology from the University of Montana is sort of like using steroids so that you can win in tether-ball at summer camp, the impulse to attain a competitive edge in academics is easy to understand. With the increasing competition for positions in prestigious undergraduate and graduate level programs the pressure to excel can easily overwhelm nagging crises of conscience. What’s more, beyond the difficult-to-enforce laws against selling or using prescription drugs without a prescription, there are no widespread systems for academic or student conduct sanctions if a student is found to be enhancing his or her performance with a pill. There are almost no legal or procedural consequences to this kind of doping. And isn’t this every bit as dishonest as copying answers on a test or committing plagiarism, both of which can lead to expulsion in egregious cases? It seems to me like to keep the academic playing field level, there needs to be some kind of policy limiting the illicit use of concentration enhancing drugs, even if it means that my degree winds up with an asterisk.
The motel where I was staying, The Sherwood Inn, is a Robin Hood themed place that’s next to Fryer Tuck’s Restaurant (which actually has pretty good Mexican food) and the Robin Hood Lounge. In case you’re in the area and you need to unwind a little, there’s also Maid Marrion’s Nail Salon, and Little John’s Tanning Salon. This is real. I understand that during the fall they see a lot of bird hunting traffic, but in January most of the tenants were there as agents of the burgeoning oil and gas interests in the region. On most nights the Robin Hood Lounge was half filled by a mixture rough hewn oilmen and close-knit tables of laughing locals exchanging rounds of Patron.
On one of my later nights there I didn’t feel much like fraternizing and was really looking forward to Hawaii. To get my spirits up I ordered a Mai Tai to go, and the conversation went something like this:
Me: You can’t, by chance, make a cocktail to go, can you?
Bartender: Sure can.
Me: This is the best place ever. Can I have a Mai Tai?
Bartender: I’ve never heard of that. What’s in it?
Me: I’m not really sure. (So I looked it up, and came up with a usable recipe that called for ingredients that these guys stocked. The bartender and I looked it over, and he made it.)
Me: Heck yeah.
Bartender: Say, that looks kind of good. Maybe I should start making those . . . . Sorta looks like a chick drink, though.
Me: Oh, it’s definitely a chick drink.
I took the Mai Tai back to the room and managed to catch a couple episodes of Law & Order: SVU on USA (and also came up with the theory that that show is 98% of their programming). The Plentywood Mai Tai was a satisfying and tantalizing foreshadow of Actual Mai Tais to come, but was entirely too sugary to be actually palatable.
Anyway the test was not a complete failure, I was allowed to return from the Great Northeast, and a couple of weeks later escape for a while to Hawaii. We drank a lot of Mai Tais, and I was thinking recently that we spent some time dialing in the recipe. It’d be a shame for all of that work to go to waste and so I decided memorialize the recipe in The Cloud. So here it goes. This is really just the original Trader Vic’s recipe except with dark and white rum instead of Martinique and Jamaican rum. And with muddled herbs.
– 1 oz dark rum + a splash extra
– 1 oz white rum
– 1 oz fresh lime juice
– 0.5 oz orgeat syrup
– 0.5 oz Grand Marnier
mint or basil
Muddle a pinch of mint or basil in a shaker. Add ice and the rest of the ingredients. Shake and strain over ice. Top with a float of dark rum and garnish with fruit or mint.
That is all.
Photos compliments of Kristine Akland.